On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > As scheduled, do_setitimer() now returns -EINVAL for invalid timeval. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- References:
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-rc5 possible regression: KDE processes die silently [fixed]
- Next by Date: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]
- Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
- Index(es):
 |