> >but that's where you would use the more explicit
> >__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, no? AFAIK, you really can remove the macro
> >SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED in its entirety.
>
> I don't remember LDD speaking about __RAW_*. (And other than not
> having looked into the code to date, I don't know the difference.)
Don't worry about the __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED stuff, that's obviously
not for generic code to use. The right answer (as I said before) is
to use DEFINE_SPINLOCK().
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
