Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code

On Mon,  9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
> well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.

I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck" state, due to general
agreement that we should implement this functionality at the VFS level, one
reason for which is unionfs's upper-vs-lower coherency problems.

Am I wrong?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
    • From: Shaya Potter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
    • From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
    • From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ten percent test
• Next by Date: Re: plain 2.6.21-rc5 (1) vs amanda (0)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 14/21] Unionfs: Document unionfs_d_release locking
• Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]