Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code

On Mon,  9 Apr 2007 10:53:51 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following patches introduce new branch-management code into Unionfs as
> well as fix a number of stability issues and resource leaks.

I have a mental note that unionfs is in the "stuck" state, due to general
agreement that we should implement this functionality at the VFS level, one
reason for which is unionfs's upper-vs-lower coherency problems.

Am I wrong?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
  - From: Shaya Potter <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
  - From: Josef Sipek <[email protected]>

References:
- [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
  - From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Ten percent test
Next by Date: Re: plain 2.6.21-rc5 (1) vs amanda (0)
Previous by thread: [PATCH 14/21] Unionfs: Document unionfs_d_release locking
Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs branch management code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]