On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays
> > > > has probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks
> > > > :/
> > >
> > > Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group,
> > > or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names.
> >
> > Almost *anything* is better than "signal_struct" ;) A task_group could
> > be fine, so something on the line of task_shared_ctx.
>
> or lets just face it and name it what it is: process_struct ;-)
That'd be fine too! Wonder if Linus would swallow a rename patch like
that...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
