On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> >> Sure. It would be nice to move ->children into signal_struct at first.
> >> Except this change breaks (in fact fixes) ->pdeath_signal behaviour.
> >
> > Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays has
> > probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks :/
>
> Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group,
> or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names.
Almost *anything* is better than "signal_struct" ;)
A task_group could be fine, so something on the line of task_shared_ctx.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
