Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:06:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> >No processor.h is such a hodgepodge of unrelated stuff that any
> >splitting up is a good thing.
> >
> 
> Fair enough.  However, I'd still like to see the X86_CR* constants 
> moved, too (and constants added for at least CR0 as well.)

Send patches then.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled -EINVAL for invalid timevals in setitimer
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI
• Previous by thread: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of the i8xx_tco watchdog driver
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]