On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:06:41PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 16:02 -0600, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote: > > Will this patch for my patch work for now? > > Yes, I think that should be fine ... it's only a theoretical worry; at > the moment sector_t is unsigned ... but just in case. > > James > > Andrew, Are you waiting for a new patch from me? Or is my patch's patch sufficient? -- mikem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- References:
- [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
- Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
- [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- Prev by Date: Re: questions about 8250 uart support for adhoc boards
- Next by Date: Re: irq balancing question
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- Next by thread: Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support
- Index(es):
![]() |