On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:29:22PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 19 February 2007 20:07, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> >
> > This patch adds the necessary changes to extend the i386 alternative
> > instruction framework extension on the x86_64 architecture.
>
> Looks complicated and somewhat fragile.
The tests on i386 and x86_64 just work fine :-)
> I think I would prefer it if you changed the pad field to a "bit not set"
> cpuid field. Then at least 2 alternatives + a nothing alternative could
> be described too.
I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean. Do you mean to add a
further alternative instruction to the struct for supporting 2 alternative
instructions?
Joerg
--
Joerg Roedel
Operating System Research Center
AMD Saxony LLC & Co. KG
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]