On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:20:36PM +0300, Cyrill V. Gorcunov ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 07:58:54PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> | Absolutely.
> | And if overall system design is good, there is no problem to change
> | (well, for those who fail to read to the end and understand my english
> | replace 'to change' with 'to create and commit') interface to the state
> | where it will satisfy all (majority of) users.
> |
> | Situations when system is designed from interface down to system ends up
> | with one thread per IO and huge limitations on how system is going to be
> | used at all.
> |
> | --
> | Evgeniy Polyakov
>
> I'm sorry for meddling in conversation but I think Linus misunderstood
> you. If I'm right you propose to "create and commit" _new_ interfaces
> only? I mean _changing_ of interfaces exported to user space is
> very painfull... for further support. Don't swear at me if I wrote
> something stupid ;)
Yes, I only proposed to change what Ingo has right now - although it is
usable, but it does suck, but since overall syslet design is indeed good
it does not suffer from possible interface changes - so I said that it
can be trivially changed in that regard that until it is committed
anything can be done to extend it.
> --
>
> Cyrill
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
