> A one-liner for each in the comments would be just enough. No. RTFM. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH x86 for review III] [17/29] x86: Add new CPUID bits for AMD Family 10 CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [17/29] x86: Add new CPUID bits for AMD Family 10 CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [17/29] x86: Add new CPUID bits for AMD Family 10 CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [17/29] x86: Add new CPUID bits for AMD Family 10 CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension
- Prev by Date: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management?
- Next by Date: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [17/29] x86: Add new CPUID bits for AMD Family 10 CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [17/29] x86: Add new CPUID bits for AMD Family 10 CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo
- Index(es):
 |