> Didn't we have problems with this exact approach before? This one was dropped > because it caused 32-bit programs to crash: > http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm2/broken-out/x86-64-ptrace-ia32-bp-fix.patch > > See: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/09/16/261 > > for the one I proposed instead. Yes you're right. I dropped it for now. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH x86 for review III] [12/29] x86_64: 32-bit ptrace mangles sixth system call argument
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [12/29] x86_64: 32-bit ptrace mangles sixth system call argument
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH x86 for review III] [1/29] i386: avoid gcc extension
- Prev by Date: Re: - rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch removed from -mm tree
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] add filesystem subtype support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [12/29] x86_64: 32-bit ptrace mangles sixth system call argument
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH x86 for review III] [12/29] x86_64: 32-bit ptrace mangles sixth system call argument
- Index(es):
 |