Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:12:33PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Greg KH ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> > > At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped?  I thought we were always going to keep
> > > the last two stable kernels up-to-date.
> 
> Not quite.  It's more of a "some overlap," so that as soon as 2.6.x
> comes out we don't instantly drop 2.6.(x-1).y stream.  But we don't keep
> it going, typically more 1 or 2 2.6.(x-1).y releases once 2.6.x is out.
> 
> > > Have I been wasting my time fwd'ing
> > > 2.6.18.y patches?
> 
> I had actually queued them up, but we only had 1 or 2 other patches,
> and they weren't significant enough to warrant flushing that queue.

I'll see if the latest stuff that is queued up and some other stuff is
worth to push out a new release in a few days.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux