It has me excited in any case. Once anything even remotely testable appears(Zach tells me not to try the current code), I'll work it into MTasker(http://ds9a.nl/mtasker) and make it power a nameserver that does async i/o,for use with very very large zones that aren't preloaded.
I'll be sure to let you know :) - z - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Zach Brown <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks
- Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review
- Next by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 00/50] -stable review
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling
- Index(es):
 |