RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick

> So what (legally) happens when someone does
> MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE(2), (~0) or (-1)? Does the judge 
> get confused?
> Then better use strings and an appropriate check.

Please let me not believe it's not possible to have a compilation test
on that that would issue a #error if param is not one of the acceptable
value...

Paul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Tracking mlocked pages and moving them off the LRU
Next by Date: Looking for trainings in VFS area
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]