RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick

On Feb 2 2007 19:37, Paul Rolland wrote:
>> MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE("yes\0 but only this .c file");
>> 
>
>MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE(0)
>(integer, not string).

So what (legally) happens when someone does
MODULE_IS_UNDER_GPL_LICENSE(2), (~0) or (-1)? Does the judge get confused?
Then better use strings and an appropriate check.


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
  - From: "Paul Rolland" <[email protected]>

References:
- RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
  - From: "Paul Rolland" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
Next by Date: dynticks + iptables almost stops the boot process [was: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm3]
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] Ban module license tag string termination trick
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]