Pieter Palmers wrote: > Stefan Richter wrote: ... >> - Fix integer overflow. > I had to use 1000000ULL instead of USEC_PER_SEC to avoid weird behavior. OK, I'll change that and will wait for... > I can't test it right now, but I'll report later. ...your and Dan's ACK before I commit the patch. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== --=- ---== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- From: Pieter Palmers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- References:
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- From: Pieter Palmers <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- From: Pieter Palmers <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Char: add __devinitdata to pci_device_ids
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Tracking mlocked pages and moving them off the LRU
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
- Index(es):
 |