which header for local_irq_save? (was Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394)

I wrote:
> --- linux.orig/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c	2007-01-27 14:07:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c	2007-02-03 13:47:33.000000000 +0100
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #include <linux/suspend.h>
>  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/irqflags.h>
> +#include <linux/preempt.h>
> +#include <linux/time.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>  

Is <linux/irqflags.h> the correct header for local_irq_save/
local_irq_restore? It seems to be <asm/system.h> under Linux 2.6.16 but
I'm not sure about later kernels.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== --=- ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
  - From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
  - From: Pieter Palmers <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
  - From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
  - From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [RFC] [PATCH] Fix up needless kmap:s
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
Previous by thread: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH update] ieee1394: cycle timer read extension for raw1394/libraw1394
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]