> You have an old VT82C686 south bridge, which was tagged as "special" by
> Alan. For this chip, Alan's code only allows devices 00:00.x to be quirked.
> As my code was merely a reimplementation of Alan's idea, it does the same.
> Your USB controllers are at 00:07.x, so I'm not surprised they weren't
> quirked.
>
> Alan, why were dev_lo and dev_hi both set to 0 for the VT82C868 in your
> implementation? Is it a typo, or...?
According to the documentation the VT82C686 has the following devices on
the internal bus: bus 0 dev ? fn 0-6. dev ? being the device of the
bridge itself. Re-reading the docs unlike the other the PCI idents aren't
fixed so my assumption of dev 0 is actually unsafe. I can't see anything
in the doc which guarantees 7 either.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
