Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update

On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:31 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current
> tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first?

Thomas just pointed out that I had missed that the bits are back in
-mm2.

Sorry for the noise.
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
  - From: john stultz <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] slab.c ifdef reduction breaks build
Next by Date: Re: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2]: Fix BUG in cancel_dirty_pages on XFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]