Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update

[john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>]

On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 18:17 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:00:55 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > This is a full replacement queue for the high resolution timer / dynamic 
> > ticks implemementation in -mm.
> 
> The Vaio broke again.  Seems to hang permanently the first time it tries to
> sleep.  The cursor doesn't flash.  Adding "clock=pit" doesn't fix it.  I'm
> disinclined to bisect it since the patch series fails to compile at
> practically all bisections points.
> 
> I'll drop all the patches, which means I drop John's vsyscall patches and
> his x86_64 conversion as well.

"He's got a bug!"
What's his bug got to do with me?
"He's got a bug!"
I ain't trying to hear that, see?

But seriously (the above might be too obscure of a reference :), my
x86_64 GTOD patches were against vanilla and were not dependent on the
HRT patches. There were a few merge/fixup patches in your tree, but I
don't recall many of them being really interleaved w/ the HRT code. I'm
I missing or forgetting some bit?

Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current
tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first?

"ain't no future in fronting"
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/