Jay Cliburn wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
As a driver maintainer, you need to patch sets, and submit them in a
timely fashion to me. Note I said patch set, not patch, in following
with Rule #3 from Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Also make sure to
review http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
Understood. Both references reviewed. Thanks.
Sorry, but one last question... These two patches generated overnight
by Andrew:
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Subject: + git-netdev-all-atl1-pm-fix.patch added to -mm tree
and
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Subject: + git-netdev-all-atl1-build-fix.patch added to -mm tree
Do I include these in my patch set that I submit to you, or do you apply
them to netdev directly?
There is no hard and fast rule. If the patch is obvious and submitted
in correct form (Andrew's notifications are not in such a form), then I
might go ahead and apply it. But I usually reply to the patch with
"applied" if so.
In general, you can answer this question yourself. Look at
netdev-2.6.git#atl1 and see what's in there.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
