Hi Jan! On 21 Jan 2007, at 22:12, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Nope, I get consistently 12e6 bytes/sec, which is 96e6 bits/sec across 100Mbps ethernet, fitting nicely with the frame overhead (some 50 bytes out of 1500, without TCP options). So no lie here. With gigabit I'm not completely sure yet, still have to see the advertised 125e6 symbols/sec (got only as far as 115e6 up to now).How fast is your Ethernet port? 100Mbps or 95.37Mbps?Same lie like with harddrives. It's around 80, not 100. But it depends on how you look at it. 80 for Layer3, possibly a little more for Layer2/1.
Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482 -- Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL++++ P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+
PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++>++++ h---- y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <[email protected]>
- RE: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>
- Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- From: Tony Foiani <[email protected]>
- Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- Next by Date: Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports
- Previous by thread: Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- Next by thread: Re: PROBLEM: KB->KiB, MB -> MiB, ... (IEC 60027-2)
- Index(es):