Ingo Molnar wrote: > what do you mean by that - which is this same resource? From what has been said here before, all futexes are stored in the same list or hash table or whatever it was. I want to see how that code behaves if many separate processes concurrently use futexes. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- Prev by Date: Re: [mm PATCH 1/6] RCU: split classic rcu
- Next by Date: Re: [mm PATCH 2/6] RCU: softirq for RCU
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- Index(es):
 |