Pierre Peiffer wrote: > I've run this bench 1000 times with pipe and 800 groups. > Here are the results: This is not what I'm mostly concerned about. The patches create a bottleneck since _all_ processes use the same resource. Plus, this code has to be run on a machine with multiple processors to get RFOs into play. So, please do this: on an SMP (4p or more) machine, rig the test so that it runs quite a while. Then, in a script, start the program a bunch of times, all in parallel. Have the script wait until all program runs are done and time the time until the last program finishes. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- References:
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- From: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] user_ns: remove CONFIG_USER_NS
- Next by Date: Re: What does this scsi error mean ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
- Index(es):