On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:08:10PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
> >Sure, but that doesn't really show the how erratic the per-filesystem
> >throughput is because the test I'm running is PCI-X bus limited in
> >it's throughput at about 750MB/s. Each dm device is capable of about
> >340MB/s write, so when one slows down, the others will typically
> >speed up.
>
> But you do also get aggregate throughput drops? (ie. 2.6.20-rc3-worse)
Yes - you can see that from the vmstat output I sent.
At 500GB into the write of each file (about 60% of the disks filled)
the per fs write rate should be around 220MB/s, so aggregate should
be around 650MB/s. That's what Im seeing with 2.6.18 and 2.6.20-rc3
with a tweaked dirty_ratio. Without the dirty_ratio tweak, you see
what is in 2.6.20-rc3-worse.
e.g. I just changed dirty ratio from 10 to 40 and I've gone from
consistent 210-215MB/s per filesystm (~630-650MB/s aggregate) to
ranging over 110-200MB/s per fielsystem and aggregates of ~450-600MB/s.
I changed dirty_ratio back to 10, and within 15 seconds we are back
to consistent 210MB/s per filesystem and 630-650MB/s write.
> >So, what I've attached is three files which have both
> >'vmstat 5' output and 'iostat 5 |grep dm-' output in them.
>
> Ahh, sorry to be unclear, I meant:
>
> cat /proc/vmstat > pre
> run_test
> cat /proc/vmstat > post
Ok, I'll get back to you on that one - even at 600+MB/s, writing 5TB
of data takes some time....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]