Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.

On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:09:03 +0200 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> > there would appear to be *lots* of cases where the ({ }) notation is
> > used when nothing is being returned.  i'm not sure you can be that
> > adamant about that distinction at this point.
> 
> IMHO, the main point of CodingStyle is to clarify how new code should
> be written and old code should've been written.

I agree.  We aren't trying to "fix" ancient history.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
  - From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
  - From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
  - From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
  - From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
Next by Date: Re: compile failure on 2.6.19
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]