On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> there would appear to be *lots* of cases where the ({ }) notation is
> used when nothing is being returned. i'm not sure you can be that
> adamant about that distinction at this point.
IMHO, the main point of CodingStyle is to clarify how new code should
be written and old code should've been written.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- References:
- [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Explain a second alternative for multi-line macros.
- Index(es):
 |