Re: [Patch] scsi: megaraid_{mm,mbox}: init fix for kdump

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:31:38 -0500 Douglas Gilbert wrote:

> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:02:17 -0800 Sumant Patro wrote:
> > 
> > See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
> > Please include output of "diffstat -p1 -w70" so that we can easily see
> > the scope of the changes.
> > 
> > and see Documentation/CodingStyle for comments below:
> > 
> > 
> >> diff -uprN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> >> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-28 09:56:04.000000000 -0800
> >> +++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-29 05:31:48.000000000 -0800
> >> @@ -779,6 +780,22 @@ megaraid_init_mbox(adapter_t *adapter)
> >>  		goto out_release_regions;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> +	// initialize the mutual exclusion lock for the mailbox
> >> +	spin_lock_init(&raid_dev->mailbox_lock);
> > 
> > Linux uses /*...*/ C89-style comments, not // C99 comments.
> 
> Randy
> It is about time this absurd stipulation was dropped.
> Are there any C compilers that can compile the linux
> kernel and that don't accept both _standard_ comment styles?

It's not a technical issue, it's just a style point.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/