Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:02:17 -0800 Sumant Patro wrote:
>
> See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
> Please include output of "diffstat -p1 -w70" so that we can easily see
> the scope of the changes.
>
> and see Documentation/CodingStyle for comments below:
>
>
>> diff -uprN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-28 09:56:04.000000000 -0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.new/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c 2006-12-29 05:31:48.000000000 -0800
>> @@ -779,6 +780,22 @@ megaraid_init_mbox(adapter_t *adapter)
>> goto out_release_regions;
>> }
>>
>> + // initialize the mutual exclusion lock for the mailbox
>> + spin_lock_init(&raid_dev->mailbox_lock);
>
> Linux uses /*...*/ C89-style comments, not // C99 comments.
Randy
It is about time this absurd stipulation was dropped.
Are there any C compilers that can compile the linux
kernel and that don't accept both _standard_ comment styles?
Doug Gilbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]