On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> Uh-huh. How much of build coverage have you got with it?
Well, as said in the patch description, I compiled alpha, arm, i386, ia64,
mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and
allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64. I also checked that
no new warnings were introduced by the patch.
> Note that "doesn't use symbols defined in sched.h" != "can remove
> include of sched.h", which, in turn, is not the same as "removing it
> doesn't cause problems on a couple of configs I've tried on amd64".
Sure. But from my experience (I started posting these patches almost five
years ago, inspired by a blog entry by davej) actually the only thing that
prevents removing the sched.h include (other than using symbols defined
there) is dereferencing current, which my scripts also check.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
