On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:27:40 +0100 (CET)
> Tim Schmielau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in
> > module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous
> > sched.h includes.
>
> Why are they "superfluous"? Because those compilation
> units pick up sched.h indirectly, via other includes?
>
> If so, is that a thing we want to do?
No, there is nothing at all in these files that needs sched.h. I suppose
the includes are left over from times when more unrelated macros lived in
sched.h (fortunately much of that cruft got cleand up already).
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
