In article <[email protected]> you wrote:
> once your program (and many others) have such a check, then the next
> step will be pressure on the kernel code to "fake" the old situation
> when there is a processor where <vague criteria of the day> no longer
> holds. It's basically a road to madness :-(
I agree that for HPC sizing a benchmark with various levels of parallelity
are better. The question is, if the code in question only is for inventory
reasons. In that case I would do something like x sockets, y cores and z cm
threads.
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
