Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:10 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:11:19 -0800
> David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > +static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> > +	{ return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio); }
> > +
> > +static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> > +	{ (void) at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value); }
> 
> whaa?  Where'd we pull that coding style from?

School of concision.  Notice also the clever ";) at the end of each line.


> Please,

I see you fixed this in what you merged to MM; thanks.

- Dave


> static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> {
> 	return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio);
> }
> 
> static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> {
> 	at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value);
> }
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux