Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:11:19 -0800
David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:

> +static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> +	{ return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio); }
> +
> +static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> +	{ (void) at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value); }

whaa?  Where'd we pull that coding style from?

Please,

static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
{
	return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio);
}

static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
	at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
  - From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
  - From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
- [patch 2.6.20-rc1 0/6] arch-neutral GPIO calls
  - From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
- [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
  - From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux disk performance.
Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
Previous by thread: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]