Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:11:19 -0800
David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:

> +static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> +	{ return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio); }
> +
> +static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> +	{ (void) at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value); }

whaa?  Where'd we pull that coding style from?

Please,

static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
{
	return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio);
}

static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
{
	at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • [patch 2.6.20-rc1 0/6] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux disk performance.
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
• Previous by thread: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]