Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

>>>>> "AvdV" == Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:

AvdV> even if you have NO power savings you still don't meet your
AvdV> criteria. That's basic ethernet for you....

AvdV> That's what I was trying to say; your criteria is unrealistic
AvdV> regardless of what the kernel does, ethernet already dictates 30
AvdV> to 45 seconds there.

Can you get to such high numbers without STP?


/Benny


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Changes to PM layer break userspace
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Changes to PM layer break userspace
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: Changes to PM layer break userspace
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Changes to PM layer break userspace
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: Changes to PM layer break userspace
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: Changes to PM layer break userspace
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
• Next by Date: Re: Possible race condition in usb-serial.c
• Previous by thread: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
• Next by thread: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]