Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax

Hi,

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:41:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > 
> >   Remove the note in the documentation that suggests people can use
> > "requires" for dependencies in Kconfig files.
> >...
> 
> Considering that noone uses it, what about the patch below to also 
> remove the implementation?

Mostly to keep the noise in the generated files low I prefer to just add 
some warning prints and I'll remove them later with some other syntax 
changes. This would also give external trees the chance to fix any 
possible usage first.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Remove suggestion that Kconfig files can use "requires" to list deps
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
  • [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19.1-rt15: BUG in __tasklet_action at kernel/softirq.c:568
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]