Re: [patch 1/2] agpgart - allow user-populated memory types.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven wrote:

On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 00:05 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 19:24 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
+       }
+
+       if (alloc_size <= PAGE_SIZE) {
+               new->memory = kmalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+       }
+       if (new->memory == NULL) {
+               new->memory = vmalloc(alloc_size);
this bit is more or less evil as well...

1) vmalloc is expensive all the way, higher tlb use etc etc
2) mixing allocation types is just a recipe for disaster
3) if this isn't a frequent operation, kmalloc is fine upto at least 2
pages; I doubt you'll ever want more
I understand your feelings about this, and as you probably understand, the
kfree / vfree thingy is a result of the above allocation scheme.

the kfree/vfree thing at MINIMUM should be changed though. Even if you
need both kfree and vfree, you should key it off of a flag that you
store, not off the address of the memory, that's just unportable and
highly fragile. You *know* which allocator you used, so store it and use
THAT info.



The allocated memory holds an array of struct page pointers. The number of
struct page pointers will range from 1 to about 8192, so the alloc size
will range from 4bytes to 64K, but could go higher depending on
architecture.

hmm 64Kb is a bit much indeed. You can't do an array of upto 16 entries
with one page in each array entry?
Arjan,
Thanks for taking time to review this.

A short background:
The current code uses vmalloc only. The potential use of kmalloc was introduced
to save memory and cpu-speed.
All agp drivers expect to see a single memory chunk, so I'm not sure we want to have an array of pages. That may require rewriting a lot of code.

If it's acceptable I'd like to go for the vmalloc / kmalloc flag, or at worst keep the current vmalloc only but that's such a _huge_ memory waste for small buffers. The flag was the original idea, but unfortunately the agp_memory struct is part of the drm interface, and I wasn't sure we could add a variable to it.

DaveJ, is it possible to extend struct agp_memory with a flags field?

Regards,
Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux