On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:
> What happens if you only ifdef out that single thing?
>
> The actual page-cleaning functions make sure to only clear the TAG_DIRTY
> bit _after_ the page has been marked for writeback. Is there some ordering
> constraint there, perhaps?
>
> I'm really reaching here. I'm trying to see the pattern, and I'm not
> seeing it. I'm asking you to test things just to get more of a feel for
> what triggers the failure, than because I actually have any kind of idea
> of what the heck is going on.
>
> Andrew, Nick, Hugh - any ideas?
If all of test_clear_page_dirty() has been commented out then the page will
never become clean hence will never fall out of pagecache, so unless Andrei
is doing a reboot before checking for corruption, perhaps the underlying
data on-disk is incorrect, but we can't see it.
Andrei, how _are_ you running this test? What's the exact sequence of steps?
In particular, are you doing anything which would cause the corrupted file
to be evicted from memory, thus forcing a read from disk? Such as
unmounting and then remounting the filesystem?
The point of my question is to check that the data is really incorrect
on-disk, or whether it is incorrect in pagecache.
Also, it'd be useful if you could determine whether the bug appears with
the ext2 filesystem: do s/ext3/ext2/ in /etc/fstab, or boot with
rootfstype=ext2 if it's the root filesystem.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]