Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> By this, we'll not access mem_section[] in usual ops.

Why do we need mem_section? We have a page table that fulfills the same 
role.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Recent mm changes leading to filesystem corruption?
Next by Date: [patch] scrub non-__GLIBC__ checks in linux/socket.h and linux/stat.h
Previous by thread: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [2/2] for ia64
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]