Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]> : [...] > No, that wouldn't make sense, that's like making a workaround depend on > arch == i386. > > I'm thinking that we should somehow enable this option on the n2100 > built-in r8169 ports by default only. Since the n2100 also has a mini-PCI > slot, and it is in theory possible to put an r8169 on a mini-PCI card, > the workaround probably shouldn't apply to those, so testing for > CONFIG_MACH_N2100 also isn't the right thing to do. Ok, I thought it was a useability thing. Let aside a few configurations, the sensible default value for this option is not clear. I have no objection against a patch but it seems a bit academic as long as nobody complains (you can call me lazy too). -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Riku Voipio <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- Prev by Date: [PATCH][RFC] consolidate line discipline number definitions
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] RAIF: Redundant Array of Independent Filesystems
- Previous by thread: Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- Next by thread: Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- Index(es):
 |