Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]> : [...] > Is there a way we can have this done by default on the n2100? I guess > that since it's a PCI device, there isn't much hope for that..? Do you mean an automagically tuned default value based on CONFIG_ARM ? -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Riku Voipio <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- From: Lennert Buytenhek <[email protected]>
- Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions)]
- Prev by Date: Re: sysfs file creation result nightmare
- Next by Date: [RFC] make reading /proc/sys/kernel/cap-bould not require CAP_SYS_MODULE
- Previous by thread: Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- Next by thread: Re: r8169 on n2100 (was Re: r8169 mac address change (was Re: [0/3] 2.6.19-rc2: known regressions))
- Index(es):
 |