On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:11:27 +0000 Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Fri, 15 December 2006 09:00:37 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:07:17 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > > Not in simple cases.
> > >
> > > 3*i + 2*j should be writen like that. Not like
> > > (3 * i) + (2 * j)
> >
> > I would just write it as:
> > 3 * i + 2 * j
>
> So would I. But I definitely wouldn't write
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2)
I would and do (the above).
> because I prefer the grouping in
> for (i=0; i<10; i+=2)
>
> Pavel may have picked a bad example, but there are cases when spaces can
> be used to group code. Just as empty lines can be used to group code.
> And in both cases the reason should be "readability".
Agreed.
> Which variant is the most readable is a highly personal matter and may
> alos change over time for any group of people. I'd vote against a stone
> tablet with 10 commandments of taste. "Make it readable, use common
> sense" is so much better, imo.
then send patches :)
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
