Re: [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:10:28 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > +#define seqlock_init(x)					\
> > +	do {						\
> > +		(x)->sequence = 0;			\
> > +		spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock);		\
> > +	} while (0)
> 
> This does not have to be a macro, does it?

Maybe it could be an __always_inline inline function (it has to be 
inlined to get the callsite based lock class key right) - but i'm not 
sure about the include file dependencies. Will probably work out fine as 
seqlock.h is supposed to be a late one in the order of inclusion - but i 
didnt want to make a blind bet.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux