Re: [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init()

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:10:28 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> +#define seqlock_init(x)					\
> +	do {						\
> +		(x)->sequence = 0;			\
> +		spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock);		\
> +	} while (0)

This does not have to be a macro, does it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init()
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init()
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] i2c updates for 2.6.20
• Next by Date: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20
• Previous by thread: [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init()
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]