On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 19:54 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > what if the irq got disabled meanwhile? Also, chip->enable is a
> > > compatibility method, not something we should use in a flow handler.
> >
> > I don't know how other arches deal with IRQ_PENDING, but ARM (OMAP at
> > least) disables the IRQ on IRQ_PENDING.
>
> Please point out where it's doing that, and I'll take a look to see
> if it's doing something it shouldn't.
It's in arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c . It uses the lowlevel function to
disable the interrupt, not chip->disable() . In gpio_irq_handler() .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
