Re: [PATCH] libata: don't initialize sg in ata_exec_internal() if DMA_NONE

Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'll follow up with conversion to ata_do_simple_cmd().

The current situation is...

ata_exec_internal_sg()	: no user except for ata_exec_internal() yet
ata_exec_internal()	: one data transferring user. other are non-data
ata_do_simple_cmd()	: three users

So, adding another exec_internal variant doesn't look so hot.  It seems
we already have enough variants considering the small number of users.
I think it's best to leave it alone for now.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] libata: fix oops with sparsemem
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] libata: don't initialize sg in ata_exec_internal() if DMA_NONE
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Mark bitrevX() functions as const
• Next by Date: Re: NULL pointer and EIP errors
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] libata: don't initialize sg in ata_exec_internal() if DMA_NONE
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: don't initialize sg in ata_exec_internal() if DMA_NONE
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]