On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:30:11 +0000
Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:11:35 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > or via the nmi_watchdog=1 or nmi_watchdog=2 boot options.
> >
> > build and boot tested on an Athlon64 box.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
metoo. I'm really struggling to recall an occasion on which the NMI
watchdog helped diagnose or fix a bug. The usual scenario nowadays is that
I ask a reporter to enable NMI watchdog and for various reasons (mostly
mysterious) no useful information comes of it.
If it's causing machines to go down then the current tradeoff doesn't seem
right.
But _is_ it causing machines to go down, after the ACPI fix?
(the patch doesn't vaguely apply btw).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
