additional oom-killer tuneable worth submitting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The kernel currently has a way to adjust the oom-killer score via 
/proc/<pid>/oomadj.
However, to adjust this effectively requires knowledge of the scores of 
all the other processes on the system.
I'd like to float an idea (which we've implemented and been using for 
some time) where the semantics are slightly different:
We add a new "oom_thresh" member to the task struct.
We introduce a new proc entry "/proc/<pid>/oomthresh" to control it.

The "oom-thresh" value maps to the max expected memory consumption for that process. As long as a process uses less memory than the specified threshold, then it is immune to the oom-killer.
On an embedded platform this allows the designer to engineer the system 
and protect critical apps based on their expected memory consumption. 
If one of those apps goes crazy and starts chewing additional memory 
then it becomes vulnerable to the oom killer while the other apps remain 
protected.
If a patch for the above feature was submitted, would there be any 
chance of getting it included?  Maybe controlled by a config option?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux