On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote: > > > Should tsc be preferred to pit though? > > Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are > detected, we mark the tsc as unstable. Turns out I was seeing C2 states. I'll stick with PIT for now. Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Campbell If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- PMTMR running too fast
- From: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
- Re: PMTMR running too fast
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: PMTMR running too fast
- From: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
- Re: PMTMR running too fast
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: PMTMR running too fast
- From: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
- Re: PMTMR running too fast
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- PMTMR running too fast
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
- Next by Date: ... and more...
- Previous by thread: Re: PMTMR running too fast
- Next by thread: Re: PMTMR running too fast
- Index(es):