Re: PMTMR running too fast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 07:41 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Should tsc be preferred to pit though?
> 
> Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are detected,
> we mark the tsc as unstable. 

I'm not using them on purpose but I'll check it out.

> It sounds as if from your earlier email the TSC works fine, so we might
> want to look at what's making the system think its not ok. I probably
> need to add a message as to why it was disqualified. However, that's a
> separate issue from the last patch.

I'll have a play, see if I can figure it out.

> Thanks for the testing!

Thanks for the fix!

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell

* Turken thinks little kids are absolutely adorable... especialyy when
  they're someone elses.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux